I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.
I've pretty much decided on switching to the "x = " arguments, instead of going with the "x > " form. I think it'll be cleaner, with less back-and-forth and explaining of the various subtleties. As a bonus I may get a chance to explain the difference between Bayesian and frequentist approaches to problems like this.
You may next want to read:
Science as evidence for Christianity (Summary and Conclusion)
Can God make a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it?
Another post, from the table of contents