I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.
This week, I switched around the order between considering James's and Paul's testimony, by placing Paul's stronger testimony first. That way, there's no doubt that this testimony carries the odds over to the side of being probable.
Things are still edited down to "Conclusion: there is in fact far more than enough evidence to overcome the prior. (part 4)"
You may next want to read:
Why we should interpret the Bible in light of science
Key principles in interpreting the Bible
Another post, from the table of contents